Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Illuminati


The illuminati can be described as a group of individuals that collectively run the world. They meet up and decide the world's fate from the comfort of a leather chair. According to theorists they are all knowing and watching, hence the "eye" (within the pyramid) on the dollar bill. Buildings also apparently contain this motif... is this just the ramblings of a schizo old man??
Why do people consider the idea of the illuminati so frightening? Orwell's prediction of 1984 came true - we can be seen on camera about 300 times a day if out and about. Apparently CCTV is for our own good and not the goverment's need to see what clothing we're wearing on a particular day. The G8 summit? Isn't this an Illuminati meeting? World leaders coming together to make descisions? The illuminati is very much real but just not in the sinister light portrayed. We are made to feel we have a say via voting, but in reality it is chosen by the all powerful. The government also created the mass media to display themselves in the best possible light. Notice how often the way society is run is questioned? Not once. We are already controlled, but ignorance is bliss!

Saturday, July 4, 2009

Happy 4th July!

Happy 4th of July!!! Post me a MJ sighting??? Please?... that reminds me, better check out that site mentioned in my Michael Jackson article. Can't blame them for wishful thinking though, it is so shocking! :'(

The Disappearance of Madeleine McCann



The following article is merely my opinion, anything stated within is based on what information is avaliable to the public domain. Overall it is merely my opinion, i.e. "conspiracy theory" and is no way precedent fact. Thanks... my disclaimer folks!

Well case closed folks, the search for Madeleine officially ended. I am so surprise given the extreme reaction and the many millions paid in by the government and the public has not resulted in a single valid lead.


I first of all want to express my disgust of the vilification of Robert Murat. He is a British international living in Portugal that offered his assistance to the case (speaking both Portugese and English). This was flagged by one pro-McCann journalist as being "too interested" in the case and "weird". This man will forever have the stigma of "abductor" due to scape-goating by the media.

There is so little detail avaliable to us on the case that it is impossible to make a firm decision on what actually happened. What we do know is that Sniffer dogs (that have been proven in the past to be 99.5% accurate regardless of Gerry McCanns claiming blood from some meat leaked out) Detected the smell of a corpse in the Renault that they were renting. These dogs have had many years training, possibly thousands of pounds spent on their training. I think they would know the difference between beef and human. In the past, the same dogs solved countless crimes and mysteries.

Another undeniable detail is the couple's extremely confused emotions in interviews. One minute they show anger at people who have accused them of involvement, the next they appear the warm-hearted tearful parents. It was said on Panorama that Kate McCann was told "not to show emotion" so that an abductor would not get a sick kick from it. Well I don't know any parents that could cope with instruction like that so soon after their child has gone missing. The next time Kate reacted to the criticism and gave a teary-eyed interview in the "One Year On" documentary on Channel 4. Body language experts believed Gerry's touch of the ear when asked if he gave Madeleine Calpol indicated that he had done just that. (Note : there is a "night" version of calpol which contains an over-the counter sedative).

Another obvious factor is that they are both doctors, one a surgeon. My opinion dictates that they may be pretty accustomed to distancing their emotions during a surgery (particularly if the patient died). They would also have pretty good knowledge of forensics and body disposal (possibly). I am not saying they are murderers, but my honest opinion is that they may have covered up an accident. I believe it may have been an overdose on a sedative (or Madeleine had an accident whilst on the sedatives e.g. fell down some steps). I have been to Portugal myself and I remember the country being extremely sleepy and sparsly populated, I cannot envisage that within a couple of days that an abductor started watching them and came up with such a plot.

Sniffer dogs also point to an area behind the sofa and the wardrobe as being in contact with a corpse. Gerry apparently was outside at some point talking to someone. Did Madeleine fall from the sofa head first when outreaching to the window to see him? Did he then put the body in the wardrobe whilst deciding what to do with it? A British family (not Jane Tanner hint hint)said on the night Madeleine went missing they saw a man holding a small child outstretched and walking towards the beach. The family said after seeing the news coverage that it was indeed Gerry. - If this was a corpse is could be an explanation for why he held the body away from him and not close to him. It has been suggested that the unmanned animal incinerators around Portugal could have been used in the body's disposal.

During police questioning she aparently refused to answer nearly all of the questions (around 40??) why would she impede the investigation to find her daughter? Why didn't she want to have a better chance of finding her?


I just believe it is ridiculous the amount of support that has been generated in their favour when we know very little.

Check out Goncalo Amaral's documentary below (the supposed "eeevil" police chief that lost his job for "unprofessionalism", hmm). He raises very valid technical points about the disappearance.
Apparently deleted phone records? varing accounts of what happened? hmmm!

Here's part 1, check youtube for parts 2-6:




Note: All above is my opinion. I do not state anything as fact..."allegedly";)

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Anna Nicole Smith's Death

Anna Nicole Smith died of an "accidental" drug overdose at the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel and Casino on February 8th 2007. Remember the "Trimspa Baby!" ads? She said you could win "a chance to party" with her at that very same hotel.


Anna Nicole had recently given birth to Dannielynn when her son took a drug overdose in the same hospital bedroom as her. She was plagued for months by nightmares and said that "Danniel wants me to come to him" according to the last ET interview with her. Several months later she had exactly the same fate as her late son.
Her autopsy report, courtesy of thesmokinggun.com reveals the types of drugs she was taking that resulted in her death.



Some theories focus around Howard K Stern, Anna's confidant and possible lover. He obtained prescriptions for Anna under aliases and according to sources "kept her on a sea of drugs day and night". It is not clear whether she wanted help for her addiction, chose to remain addicted, or Howard simply encouraged it to get worse. Howard making films of her stoned with clown make-up on and declaring that "this is worth money" shows at the very least that he was keen on exploiting her. Some of the rich and famous are surrounded by "yes men" that allow them to indulge in any habit they so wish. It is understandable that she was depressed over her son's death. Did Howard exploit this sadness, obtain more and more drugs until she eventually drugged herself into oblivion and died? Was this to obtain her fortune? The coroner did say each amount of drugs in themselves wouldn't kill a person, it was the quantity of drugs. This shows at the very least it was not suicide - suicides are shown by a very high dose of a single drug.

What do you think?

The Death of Michael Jackson






Michael Jackson, as we all know, was pronounced dead at around 2:26 pm on Thursday 25th of June. He "died" in effect approximately an hour of a half earlier. Michael Jackson's personal physician (and CARDIOLOGIST) insisted on him being taken to Ronald Reagan UCLA medical center for further futile attempts to save Jackson's life.



Not only was his death shocking, but it also raised more questions about his increasingly dark private life. Currently the media are turning his death into a drugs scandal. He has not even been buried yet and the media can think no better than to continue the rumours that plagued him in life. However he died, I truly believe it was due to stress and mental suffering. When Elvis died, people seemingly shook off the element of drug abuse and celebrated him for his music and life. Jackson ended his life amidst a rapid fall from grace due to child abuse scandals and extreme eccentricities. It feels almost impossible to celebrate him in the light we would have had he died at his musical peak. The reaction to his death is bitter-sweet indeed for the king of pop, sales are up, respect is down.

The cause of death according to much speculation is a drugs overdose. The media is reporting he took up to 7 (maybe more) prescription drugs at the time, which even included anasthetic drugs for use in operations. It is hard to deny the tough times Michael Jackson has been through over recent years. Rumours of him sleeping in a hyperbaric chamber, purchasing the elephant man's bones, going through up to 50 cosmetic proceedures and molesting children have not played out in his favour. One source reports that during the 2005 child molestation trial he was taking up to 40 vicodin tablets per day. This is quite hard to believe, even taking into account tolerance of a drug over time. A former nanny came forward with a claim of pumping Michael's stomach "many times" over the years (disputed), and one former nurse and nutritionist reportedly denied him access to Propofol, the anesthesic drug apparently implicated in his death. The media and members of the Jackson family are most concerned about the star's use of demerol. I remember picking up a US version of the National Enquirer whilst in Iceland in 2007. It reported his self-induced isolation in his rented LA home (reportedly unkept with apparent urine and faeces of the floor) and his daily routine of taking demerol and his beloved "jesus juice". I shall scan part of this very soon. It's eearily similar to his actual demise.



It was widely thought that demerol was to blame for his death, however, Dr Conrad Murray declared that he had not given Jackson the lethal drug. What is fishy about the doctor is that he fled the scene once Michael was declared dead. He also provided Jackson with "incorrect" CPR according to commentators. Did he flee the scene to dispose of evidence? Get his story straight? Communicate with his lawyer? An innocent man would not leave the scene if he had nothing to hide. Arguably he would have out-stayed his welcome because of the magnitude of the star and his apparent "friendship" with Jackson. CPR was performed on Jackson's bed which many deemed inappropriate. A bed is not firm enough to provide the most effective chest compressions to re-start the heart. Dr Murray also did not personally dial the 911 call because "he didn't know the location exactly" (regardless of the fact he must have somehow navigated there to go to work in the first place). Eventually after much delay, security personnel made the call. The medical staff on the line were trying to find out Jackson's condition and the doctor remained silent in the background. Was this a legal move to not say anything incriminating?? The most bizarre thing about Dr Murray is the most obvious. His specialty is cardiology - the heart. He would know the best way to respond when someone is in cardiac arrest and would possibly advise on medications or appropriate use of medications to prevent such a situation occuring in the first place. However on the more sinister side, he would also know how to effectively stop the heart without prolonged pain and suffering. Was he implicated in an assisted suicide? Michael Jackson was in a frail state and was less than several weeks away from his opening show at the O2 Arena in London. This was apparently his "glorious return" to the top. Very few people could see this happening, most dates were pushed back to March 2010. Was this his final escape from disappointing his fans and evading financial woes? From a technical perspective it made sense for him to end his life at that point, he was shortly about to fly to London for the final rehearsals and could possibly find no access to, nor smuggle such lethal substances into England to kill himself with before the concerts, it also prevented his body being flown for many hours back to America. It is as if he had given himself the maximum time before deciding that he could not get away with not doing the promised concerts. If this is indeed the case, I do not believe any amount of disappointment to his fans is worth his life. I would much rather he cancel and remain alive, as do many people. The concert promoter that insisted he do that many concerts to begin with has played a part in his demise. It was obvious he could not go from not performing in 15 years to performing the concert of a lifetime with only 4 months to prepare.





The most widely noted conspiracy on the topic at the moment is that Michael faked his death in order to escape the glare of the media, performing at the concerts and his financial battles. We do not have a death certificate avaliable to us via TMZ or other sources. The theory seems credible as long as we ignore people's romanticized theory that he did it in order to put on a show of a lifetime at a later date. I believe he grew tired of performing. If anything, I could see him living out the rest of his days quietly under a new identity. However, this theory does not seem very well thought out. It is basically the same as the conspiracy surrounding the death of Elvis. Until we see Michael Jackson's coffin fitted with an air conditioning system and his brow "sweating", I shall disregard this theory. With the world obsessed with him, it is hard to picture him not being spotted anywhere at all, however http://www.michaeljacksonsightings.com/ display a single, badly-pixelated photo which is apparently Michael after his death. We see no face, just a backward turned body with an umbrella. If it is indeed him, we cannot date this photo. It could just be a recently taken unseen photo of him. An extremely creative ellaboration on the theory is that Jackson had a terminally ill patient recieve plastic surgery to look like him and then die in his place. I have looked at his appearance for many years, particularly the nose. I doubt a plastic surgeon could create the thinning and decomposition of the ill person's nose to the state of Jackson's (not meaning to be insulting). Everything, about Jackson is the same as I remember. If it was possible, the surgeon must have been so good at plastic surgery on his stand-in that he was bordering on witchcraft.

I quite like the idea put forward that he'll turn up at one of his cancelled shows in the thriller zombie makeup to shock the world. This however, is just wishful thinking.



Le Roi est mort, vivre le Roi!



(The King is dead, long live the king!)




Note: All ideas in this post is a mixture of personal opinions of myself and others. I do not state anything here as a president fact.